Contact Us Site Map

Foundation Conversation

navigation - About CIC
navigation - Conferences and Events
navigation - Projects and Services
navigation - Tuition Exchange Program
navigation - For Presidents and CAOs
navigation - Making the Case
navigation - Publications

click for a printer friendly version

"Remarks"
2003 Foundation Conversation Meeting
March 21, 2003
New York, NY

Richard Ekman
President
Council of Independent Colleges

It’s a pleasure to be able to welcome all of you to this annual event in New York City. The Council of Independent Colleges is pleased to hold a major event each year in New York—because so many foundations are located here, because New York is a major cultural and commercial center for our country, and because CIC wants to play a part in helping to support New York after the terrible events of September 2001.

I’m particularly grateful to TIAA-CREF and to its president, Herb Allison, for hosting us in this magnificent conference center, and I’m grateful to Bob Frehse of the William Randolph Hearst Foundations and Doreen Boyce of The Buhl Foundation, for their leadership in organizing today’s program.

Today, our goal is to explore the relationship between two key segments of the so-called “independent” sector—colleges and universities, on the one hand, and philanthropic and corporate foundations, on the other. Our topic is the role of liberal art colleges in a democratic society. Nothing could be quite as important or appropriate as an exploration of the ways in which these two major non-governmental sectors work together to define and enhance that role.

I probably do not need to remind anyone in this room that only a generation ago both higher education institutions and foundations tended to focus on long-term and gradual changes in society. The rationale—sometimes articulated, but often implicit—was that it was the responsibility of local, state, and federal government to attend to the immediate needs of citizens. Only non-governmental entities, such as colleges or foundations, could take the longer view of what was likely to ameliorate our social and civic problems.

In recent years, these roles have been changing. Government at all levels has been less effective in dealing with many of the near-term problems that we are facing, and colleges and universities and foundations have tended to do more to demonstrate their immediate usefulness to the communities in which they are located. This is not to say that colleges and universities or foundations have altogether abandoned their traditional long-term goals of the development of human and intellectual capital or the support of basic research that may eventually produce discoveries that will improve our civic or material circumstances, but the new fact of the past 25 years has been the extent to which colleges and universities have been deeply, actively involved in their communities in trying to address such issues as hunger, poverty, school improvement, and the extent to which many foundations are also now focused more narrowly on short-term and measurable goals.

The good news is that voluntarism appears to have increased in American society, and especially among young people, including college students. The bad news is that voting and other kinds of political activism are much diminished in comparison with a generation ago. Quite a bit has been written about these diverse trends. William Galston of the University of Maryland and Sylvia Hurtado of the University of Michigan have written about these matters especially well, in my view. Private colleges and universities, with their long commitment to certain values and traditions of service, have been especially prominent in the increased voluntarism. If you look closely at the activities of Campus Compact, for example, you will see that it is the smaller private colleges that are the leaders nationally in service learning and in other forms of community service. And if you look at CIC’s own “Engaging” and “Urban Missions” programs you will see remarkable evidence of these activities.

But the proposition before us today is what foundations and colleges can do—and should do—together to strengthen democratic society. We will begin today with a panel in which three brief presentations, representing very different approaches, will stimulate our thinking. Then we will divide into small groups where two or three foundation officers will moderate discussions on today’s topic. Finally, we will come together for lunch and after lunch Leslie Lenkowsky, chief executive officer of the Corporation for National and Community Service, will speak to us. I should point out that one of our panelists, Eugene Lang, chairman of the E.M. Lang Foundation and founder of Project Pericles, will be speaking about Project Pericles publicly for the very first time today and Leslie Lenkowsky will be describing the CNCS’s work in higher education publicly for the first time today. We are honored by the participation of these individuals, as well as by Gara LaMarche of the Open Society Institute and Richard Guarasci, president of Wagner College and author of Democratic Education in the Age of Difference.

Thank you.


back to top

Copyright ©1997-2008 Council of Independent Colleges. All rights reserved.